Futurity.org – Designing safer drivers
Posted By Hannah Hickey-UW On August 16, 2010 @ 2:17 pm In Science & Technology | 3 Comments
U. WASHINGTON-SEATTLE (US)—There may be good news for drivers swerving while sending one last text message—not to mention those worried about ending up in their path. Early research shows an in-car coach has the strongest effect on drivers most prone to distraction.
A recent study, published in the Journal of Transportation Engineering , classified young drivers as low risk, medium risk, or high risk in terms of their propensity to space out at the wheel.
The study then looked at the effect of an electronic coach that uses an eye tracker to monitor drivers’ gaze. With just a small amount of coaching, high-risk drivers more than doubled their time until a virtual crash.
“Our research shows that these high-risk drivers might not be thrill seeking or aggressive—maybe they’re just not aware of what the risks are,” says Linda Ng Boyle, a University of Washington  associate professor of industrial and systems engineering. “By providing continual feedback, drivers may be more likely to learn from their mistakes and put their eyes back on the road.”
The researchers studied 53 drivers between the ages of 18 and 21. Subjects operated a driving simulator cruising a two-lane highway with oncoming traffic.
The drivers were asked to simultaneously perform simple matching tasks on a screen beside the steering wheel, a distraction at about the level of scanning a playlist on an mp3 player. An eye tracker monitored the drivers’ eye movements.
Drivers were given a financial incentive to perform as many correct matches as possible during the drive.
The first drive sorted drivers based on how long they looked away from the road and to what degree that inattention put them at risk. Drivers were clustered in three groups.
The high-risk drivers’ longest glances tended to be between 2 1/2 seconds and 3 seconds, compared with less than 2 seconds for the longest glances by the moderate- and low-risk groups. High-risk drivers also had the shortest time to collision, a measure of how long until they could crash.
Next, half of the drivers in each group had a computerized eye-tracking system installed that noted their longest glances. When drivers glanced away for a long time, the system flashed a reminder on the task screen telling them to put their eyes back on the road. After the drive, a trip report summarized what the driver did right and wrong.
This in-car coach decreased the length of high-risk drivers’ glances by an average of 0.4 seconds, putting them on par with the other two groups.
Even more dramatically, it decreased the high-risk drivers’ longest glances by 1 second compared to high-risk drivers who got no feedback. Feedback also increased the high-risk drivers’ time to collision by roughly 8 seconds.
For the low- and medium-risk drivers, feedback had much less effect.
A lot of people are trying to design safer cars. Boyle, on the other hand, is trying to design safer drivers.
“I think that drivers are coachable,” Boyle says. “The worst drivers can benefit the most, because we can change their behavior the most dramatically. We can also reinforce the good behavior for safer drivers.”
Boyle’s current research is using this type of driver-monitoring technology for commercial drivers, elderly drivers at risk of cognitive declines and drivers who have suffered traumatic brain injuries.
The research was funded by a Dwight David Eisenhower Graduate Fellowship, the National Highway Institute, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the National Science Foundation.
More news from the University of Washington: uwnews.org | University of Washington News and Information