+ Reply to Thread
Results 11 to 18 of 18
06-21-2012, 08:36 PM #11
If you decide that you can wear the 1950s case, I'd say the 233. Has it all, and can be had for your price point used.“I’m sorry, but having an Aston Martin DB9 on the drive and not driving it is a bit like having Keira Knightley in your bed and sleeping on the couch. If you’ve got even half a scrotum it’s not going to happen.” - Jeremy Clarkson
Aston Martin DB9
06-21-2012, 08:40 PM #12
06-21-2012, 09:17 PM #13
06-22-2012, 02:47 AM #14Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
How about Pam 48(40mm)? It looks great on my 7" wrist.
06-22-2012, 03:05 AM #15
06-22-2012, 09:56 AM #16
One thing that I'm not sure about is the domed crystal. I was thinking I read somewhere that maybe the dome is higher on the 233? Not sure as I've never compared the 2 side by side.
My bad on the 90; thought I saw a pic of one that didn't have the cyclops.Un-Retired
06-22-2012, 01:35 PM #17
I appreciate the suggestions guys...thanks! I need to try on the 233 and the 312 again. Maybe I was just crazy in the humidity of Florida a few weeks ago and the watch is a good size.-Patrick
06-22-2012, 01:40 PM #18
Just found a 321 which isn't bad either...
Or the 320...