+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: is this multifamily apartment good?

          
   
  1. #1
    Dreamer98 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    5

    Default is this multifamily apartment good?

    I saw this multifamily apartment and had some questions im young too, only 16 just wondering about whether or not the person that buys this apartment actually gets 3.4mm a year? that would mean roughly 283k per month. do ppl that buy these actually get that much?

    Thank you for your time

    Heres the link to the apartment up for sale

    LoopNet - Brand NEW 126-Unit Condo Bldg. A REAL MONEY MAKER!, Mid/High-Rise, 120 Beach 26th Street, Far Rockaway, NY

    Ik dumb question but just wanted to know

  2. #2
    TurboBaron9's Avatar
    TurboBaron9 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    4,584

    Default

    as far as i can tell the whole building is for sale. don't know much about building real estate but 38 mill doesn't seem to bad, but the location is kinda off, NY, so i dont know.
    A successful man is someone who wakes up in the morning, goes to sleep at night, and does whatever makes him happy in between.

    Happiness is the only thing worth pursuing.


    A turbo, exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster. - Jeremy Clarkson

  3. #3
    Hovy's Avatar
    Hovy is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Montreal | Boston
    Posts
    3,557

    Default

    First, you need to be 18 to register the forum and to try to answer your question, yes it's possible to make 3.4M$/year (and a hell lot more) as income from a real estate property. However, the 3.4M$/year number seems to be an anticipated/fictional number as the seller proposes different avenues as to what could be done with the building (rent apartments, sell condos, convert to hotel). You're young, if you wish to get in the real estate business, start now. The younger you start, the more you learn, the more you fail (which is better when young), the higher chances of acquiring success and wealth. All the best.

  4. #4
    anon's Avatar
    anon is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,379

    Default

    There is so much more that would have to be clarified before anyone could comment on the expected income it would generate.

    But to answer your question, some of the wealthiest people I know (private jet money) made it in big real estate. It didn't happen over night but the snowball grew over time.

  5. #5
    RyanK's Avatar
    RyanK is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oahu, HI/ Currently San Angelo, TX
    Posts
    671

    Default

    That 3.4m is the best possible scenario, thats usually how multi-unit properties are marketed. I bet if you asked for the numbers from the prior year they wouldn't be anywhere near that. But yes it is possible.
    Last edited by RyanK; 07-03-2010 at 07:15 AM.

  6. #6
    SWELLS's Avatar
    SWELLS is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    City of Angels
    Posts
    1,576

    Default

    they're reporting an "actual cap" that is ACTUALLY a "pro forma" based on future income considering X vacancy allowance. Now, let's say you can realistically achieve a 9 cap. How do I know this? Read the press about this: On the market | The Real Deal | New York Real Estate News

    If it can be delivered vacant, there is no such thing as ACTUAL income - it's pro forma.

    cap rate - capitalization rate - return on your money.

    Calculated by a simple equation: CAP=PRICE/NOI (Net Operating Income; income after expenses)

    For this property: $38M/a reported $3.4M NOI = 11.18%

    This claims 9% return, so how do you explain the discrepancy?

    Here's the ultimate conclusion - a loopnet add can never answer the question of "is this a good deal" - due diligence proves that, not obscured numbers.

  7. #7
    Exxile20's Avatar
    Exxile20 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RyanK View Post
    That 3.4m is the Net operating income, that means thats without expenses. After subtracting property management fees, repairs and upkeep, insurance, mortgage payment and all the other random expenses you'd probably be extremely lucky to make $500,000 a year.

    Number is just completely pulled out of the air, theres no saying what you could make on it, I know nothing of that property's condition or the market in that area, but its just to give you an idea.
    What did you just say?

    Gross= Before deductions, what a salaried employee's taxes are based off.

    Net= After deductions, what a self-employed/businesses taxes are based off.

    Net Operating Income= After operating costs, but before tax deductions.

    If you deduct your operating costs from your operating income, and it is below zero, or in the negative, you are now using Net Operating Loss. (Claiming a loss on your taxes)

    If its used as a apartment/condo, 3.4mm/yr on GROSS INCOME ALONE would necessitate the following;

    If all 126 units were ready to rent and they were split evenly down the middle.... (63 1br, 63 2br) Remember, most rentals add ~20% for each additional room

    and the following was correct
    9% Cap Rate
    91% Occ Rate

    Then the following would have to be correct;

    A minimum of 58 rooms per size should be rented at all times

    1br Gross/yr = $1.4mm
    2br Gross/yr = $2.0mm

    Meaning

    1br Per/Mo Per/Unit = $2,011.49/mo
    2br Per/Mo Per/Unit = $2,873.56/mo
    or
    1br (All) Per/Mo = $116,666.42.00/mo
    2br (All) Per/Mo = $166,666.48.00/mo

    Proving that

    1br (All) Per/Mo ($116,666.42) X 12 Months = $1,399,997.04
    2br (All) Per/Mo ($166,666.48) X 12 Months = $1,999,997.76

    Totaling $3,399,994.80

    Now remember, the numbers above are to GROSS $3.4million. Now factor in about 39%-45% for taxes to figure your true Net Income.

    At that rate (lets say 42% for all fees/taxes), you would have a net income (NOT NET OPERATING INCOME) of $1,972,000.00/yr.

    Now figure out, given those prices per unit, what you would make if you increased your occupancy rating to 98%.

    98% of 126 is ~124

    So, 62 units/per size (1br and 2br)

    1br Per/Mo Per/Unit = $2,011.49/mo
    2br Per/Mo Per/Unit = $2,873.56/mo
    or
    1br (All) Per/Mo = $124,712.38/mo
    2br (All) Per/Mo = $178,160.72/mo

    Giving you

    1br (All Occupied) Per/Mo ($124,712.38) X 12 Months = $1,496,548.56
    2br (All Occupied) Per/Mo ($178,160.72) X 12 Months = $2,137,928.64

    Totaling now $3,634,477.20, a difference of $234,482.40/yr.

    Hope that makes sense.

    And I'm tired, if my math is off, **** it
    Last edited by Exxile20; 07-03-2010 at 08:21 AM.

  8. #8
    RyanK's Avatar
    RyanK is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oahu, HI/ Currently San Angelo, TX
    Posts
    671

    Default

    I know my original post was messed up, realized that right after. It's late here in hawaii

    You must've had the window open for quite awhile without refreshing it to get that quote this long after

  9. #9
    Exxile20's Avatar
    Exxile20 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RyanK View Post
    I know my original post was messed up, realized that right after. It's late here in hawaii

    You must've had the window open for quite awhile without refreshing it to get that quote this long after
    Haha, INDEED! Sorry to nab you like that! Mental math is a PIA!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Powered by scoobie.com.