Thread: 2010 autobiography range rover sport supercharged or 2011 cayenne turbo s

price difference = 106 for the range and 173 for the cayenne take that into consideration.

which one would you rather have and why? i've always had a thing for range rovers but maybe its time for a change

173? That's getting pretty steep and huge difference from the range.

I really can't say I would take one over the other because I would opt for an X6M or X5M instead.

G wagon FTW

Originally Posted by AutoThisWorld

G wagon FTW

Wow, I nearly forgot! +1 on the G55. It's still the coolest SUV out there and I miss my mom's.

Can any one just answer the OP's question?

Range Rover. 2010 is a stunning machine and for almost half the price of a smorche makes a lot of sense.

I recently traded in a Porsche Cayenne Turbo S for the new 2010 Range Rover 5.0 Supercharged Autobiography.

I like the RR better than the Porsche because it is a great cruiser and looks absolutely beautiful. Service is very expensive though and it will break a lot - for sure.

That being said, the Porsche is way faster and handles way better - and probably a more complete package.

Go for the RR - you will love it.

I'm guessing your reffering to the SC 2010? I would opt for the Range Rover. Interior room, quality and ride comfort is huge for me.

AUTOBIOGRAPHY EDITION!!
We have it as a secondary vehicle and it is amazing.
The interior still makes me cry.
Partners Range Rover Autobiography Edition

Range Rover. 2010 is a stunning machine and for almost half the price of a smorche makes a lot of sense.

Starts at 104k, fully outted is like 118.

The Cayenne is awesome, and I would pick it hands down, but DAMN that Turbo S is a full $100k more than my 08 Cayenne S was.