Has RR reliability improved any?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Has RR reliability improved any?

          
   
  1. #1
    president is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    25

    Default Has RR reliability improved any?

    Just curious...

    I heard that they have been near the bottom in terms of quality for near a decade.

    have things turned around since then?

  2. #2
    ADV.1 Tony's Avatar
    ADV.1 Tony is offline Silver_Sponsor
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles, California
    Posts
    920

    Default

    I believe so. I don't personally have one but my father has had two in the last 7 years and NO problems other than regular maintenance. He racks up the miles too. I think they've changed for the better.

  3. #3
    keiphers's Avatar
    keiphers is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    601

    Default

    Range Rover has definitely improved the quality of its products. No car is perfect, but my family's 2008 RRS Supercharged is still in great shape. My M3 had more problems than our Rovers are having.
    '11 RRS Supercharged RSC600
    '97 Defender 90

  4. #4
    A*aron's Avatar
    A*aron is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    1,302

    Default

    My HSE has 33k miles with no problems

  5. #5
    Novus's Avatar
    Novus is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    29

    Default

    83k miles (133xxxkm) on my '05 Rover. Just general maintenance for me as well. Nothing significant... yet (other than repairs from offroading).
    I've heard that '07+ Rovers are super reliable (mechanically). Electrically, there still seems to be issues but I don't think anything significant in the majority of vehicles.

  6. #6
    cody's Avatar
    cody is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Yes. I had an '03, then an '05 (last year of the BMW engine), '07 SC, and now a '10 SC. I had a few issues with the '03, the '05 was slightly better (but the more complicated MOST system had occasional issues, and a battery drain). The '07 was nearly flawless, and the '10 has had very minimal issues (only thing was a wire harness for the camera system that they redesigned).

  7. #7
    mcanzio's Avatar
    mcanzio is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    La Jolla, CA
    Posts
    218

    Default

    My '08 SC has been great for the most part... minus the fact that both the transfer-case and transmission were kaput! I just got the truck back from the shop...one of the internal bearings in the t-case was not rotating smoothly which resonated and over time completely stripped the teeth on the transmission input shaft! Long story short...with only 47,000 miles on the clock....my extended warranty covered installing remanufactured parts. Thankfully, Land Rover Assured sent me good quality professionally rebuilt products, unlike JUNK from LKQ (usually wrecked vehicles). I have had some horrible experience with LKQ in the past! All in all...I believe the warranty adjustor mentioned that he has been seeing more and more 2006+ L322's coming in for new tranny's and t-cases which is insane considering such low mileage. For the most part 2007+ L322's are fairly reliable.
    2008 Range Rover SC Westminster
    (2010+ MY Conversion)


    2001 Range Rover 4.6 HSE
    285/70R16 Nitto Trail Grappler's
    2" OME Lift w/ Fox Reservoir Shocks
    Tom Woods Driveshafts
    Custom Stereo

  8. #8
    MazzaFiveOneFour's Avatar
    MazzaFiveOneFour is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,061

    Default

    I hear from owners they're not good for daily driving in the snow so if you're living in a northern state or anywhere in Canada basically, it's not a good buy. From what my friends/people I know who have/had them they usually spend a few thousand dollars every spring to replace parts and for a full tune up.

    For the newer ones, 2011+, I have no feedback on those.
    http://www.youtube.com/mazzafiveonefour - My YouTube car channel
    2002 Honda Civic
    1957 Chevy Bel Air Restoration thread, click here: http://www.luxury4play.com/vintage-c...ml#post1988187

  9. #9
    A*aron's Avatar
    A*aron is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    1,302

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MazzaFiveOneFour View Post
    I hear from owners they're not good for daily driving in the snow so if you're living in a northern state or anywhere in Canada basically, it's not a good buy. From what my friends/people I know who have/had them they usually spend a few thousand dollars every spring to replace parts and for a full tune up.

    For the newer ones, 2011+, I have no feedback on those.
    not good in the snow? My HSE is an absolute tank in the snow and I've had it in unplowed 28" of fresh white stuff. It's too heavy to not be good in the snow. 2yrs and 2 winters with 33k miles. 1 maintenance 1 flat tire and that be it. 2nd service light just came on.

  10. #10
    Sleepy996's Avatar
    Sleepy996 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    1,054

    Default

    I own a 04 HSE with 90k miles and 07 HSE with 60k miles. No issues other then normal maintenance etc and I beat on my trucks. The 04 HSE is kept in PC Utah and it loves the snow but I had A/T tires put on both.
    Last edited by Sleepy996; 10-19-2012 at 07:42 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Powered by scoobie.com.