+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 47 of 47
Like Tree4Likes

Thread: Daily Driver: 09 CTS-V or 08 M3

          
   
  1. #41
    DrakeKemper's Avatar
    DrakeKemper is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Toluca Lake/Burbank
    Posts
    686

    Default

    I daily drive an M3 and love it. 09 CTS-V's are more expensive so wouldn't it be more like 09' CTS-V vs 10' M3?

    I'd go with the 2010 M3 because of the upgrades that they made. But I'd rather have the CTS-V than the 08.
    2003 Porsche GT3 RSR
    1997 Porsche BSR RaceCar - #838
    1991 Hot Girlfriend
    Rally4ACause.com

  2. #42
    Shawnny's Avatar
    Shawnny is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,561

    Default

    ^ Plus the Cads are just ugly, unlike the M3.

  3. #43
    SoCal Mag's Avatar
    SoCal Mag is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Orange County, Cali
    Posts
    789

    Default

    ^the Caddy gets way more looks than a M3!
    Especially out here in Cali!!!
    Last edited by SoCal Mag; 01-04-2012 at 04:51 PM.
    Ride - 'Bagged 2008 Dodge Magnum SE
    SoCalLX - Where Southern California Car Culture Meets Modern Mopar Muscle

  4. #44
    DrakeKemper's Avatar
    DrakeKemper is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Toluca Lake/Burbank
    Posts
    686

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SoCal Mag View Post
    ^the Caddy gets way more looks than a M3!
    I definitely disagree with that comment, however, I love the look of the CTS-V sedan, i don't think it gets more looks than the M3
    2003 Porsche GT3 RSR
    1997 Porsche BSR RaceCar - #838
    1991 Hot Girlfriend
    Rally4ACause.com

  5. #45
    A*aron's Avatar
    A*aron is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SoCal Mag View Post
    ^the Caddy gets way more looks than a M3!
    I don't own either and i'm sorry but the caddy could not possibly get more looks as there is almost little to no exterior difference from a stock cts and I pass a cts every 3rd car I see. m3's not so much.

    plus i'm sticking with my praying mantis comparison
    2011 550i xdrive Dinan tuned Stage I
    2010 GL450 black on black
    2006 Carver 38 Super Sport
    1979 Piper Cherokee 6
    Pinarello FP2
    That's my fun for now

  6. #46
    RWD Madness's Avatar
    RWD Madness is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    1,335

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shawnny View Post
    ^ Plus the Cads are just ugly, unlike the M3.
    The new CTS-V's are beautiful. M3 looks way to boring in my opinion. Pretty much every BMW except the 6 series is a little dull if you ask me.
    SoCal Mag likes this.
    "When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car."

  7. #47
    A*aron's Avatar
    A*aron is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pmdowd6 View Post
    The new CTS-V's are beautiful. M3 looks way to boring in my opinion. Pretty much every BMW except the 6 series is a little dull if you ask me.
    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Back of the V still looks like an old persons car and old school caddy in my opinion
    2011 550i xdrive Dinan tuned Stage I
    2010 GL450 black on black
    2006 Carver 38 Super Sport
    1979 Piper Cherokee 6
    Pinarello FP2
    That's my fun for now

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Powered by scoobie.com.