+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 24
Thread: Audi URQ and S1...
-
05-15-2008, 08:57 PM #1
Audi URQ and S1...
Awesome. I love Group B cars and their road-going derivatives. A little AV candy...

Last edited by Turbology; 07-24-2010 at 04:48 PM.
Boost Is Better
-
05-15-2008, 09:06 PM #2
URQ is a fun fun fun car

Watches, Cars, Community.......who can ask for anything more? Well, maybe a little DANGER
V Studio | Photography
-
05-15-2008, 09:16 PM #3
Love it!
Quattro is the hottest and best Audi ever!
-
05-15-2008, 11:45 PM #4
Absodamnlutely; close second is RS2, but URQ is just brutal.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...70040988520490Last edited by Turbology; 07-24-2010 at 04:54 PM.
Boost Is Better
-
05-16-2008, 09:58 PM #5
that URQ is soooo sexy.
Taylor A. Maneri
2004 R32 ::SOLD::
03 Audi A4 1.8QTM ::SOLD::
2011 Subaru WRX Sedan
"inch by inch, life's a cinch"
"Marriage is the chief cause of divorce." - Groucho Marx
-
06-08-2008, 08:16 PM #6
Man Group B was something else...
Last edited by Turbology; 07-24-2010 at 04:57 PM.
Boost Is Better
-
06-08-2008, 11:31 PM #7
i am having boost overload..
-
06-09-2008, 01:23 PM #8
Hahaha no coincidence that the Dahlback Golf uses a worked Audi 5-cyl engine...

http://www.eurotuner.com/featuredveh...gti/index.html
Before I get too far into the ins and outs of Dahlback, let me clarify what will be the first subject for debate, the cover blurb. To answer the question on everyone's minds: Yes, the infamous Golf may be able to put out 1,200 horsepower. Possibly. The story that comes from Hans Dahlback, the owner of Dahlback Racing and the mastermind behind these insane cars, is that the car, when running on a dyno that bolts to the hubs, produced well over 850 hp to the wheels at around 8,000 rpm before the dyno started reading errors--and the car revs to upward of 11,000 rpm. Using a 15 percent drivetrain-loss calculation, at 8,000 rpm the car was over 1,000 flywheel horsepower. I'm making an educated guess that the car produced another few ponies in the 3,000 rpm that followed.
Considering Dahlback claims the motor pulls strong until just under 11,000 rpm--with the power increasing dramatically in the last couple thousand rpm--it's reasonable to assume, considering the extent the motor's power curve was climbing at the point the dyno stopped reading, that the car would have likely gained another 100 or 200 horses in the remaining available revs. You also have to keep in mind that Dahlback massively underpromises any horsepower claim. I was told by various people at Dahlback's shop that the Golf was producing significantly more than 850 wheel horsepower on the dyno, but Dahlback would only confirm 850-plus hp, and thus that is what I worked my calculations from.
Last edited by Turbology; 07-24-2010 at 04:58 PM.
Boost Is Better
-
06-18-2008, 12:46 AM #9
I came across this randomly on YouTube; wow!
Last edited by Turbology; 07-24-2010 at 04:59 PM.
Boost Is Better
-
01-22-2010, 08:46 PM #10
Another one back from the grave for SVTxTERM1NATOR.
Boost Is Better



Reply With Quote
